| |
|
"I enjoyed talking with people about the process of creating the pieces, the forming, glazing and firing-but when asked about why they should purchase one piece over another, I felt somewhat uncomfortable. I think that several people looked at me strangely when I told them to pick up the pieces and feel them, hold them, and try to connect with them. I told people that I was a beginning potter and each piece represented a journey from where I started...."
-Steven D. Lee
|
| |
|
“What makes one pot have a measure of life while another seems dull
and dead is as difficult to account for as any other evidence of the workings
of
human personality and expression. Most potters have had the experience of making
a number of pieces, all perhaps more or less similar, and of having one or two
stand out as if they belonged in another class of objects altogether. This distinction
of liveliness or vitality may defy analysis. But it has something to do with
the flow of intention from the potter into the pot, with nothing intervening
between. Although concentrated effort is required to establish and sustain such
a flow, a quality of relaxation, even of thoughtlessness, must also enter in
, rather than a feeling of struggle, doubt, or uncertainty. Good work is probably
always the indirect result of a long effort to learn the craft, to get the operation
of potting under control and to know where the real values reside. But, as in
the case of a good shot with the bow, the actual accomplishment of something
meaningful, the hitting of the target, seems to have an ease almost as if done
by someone else.
Like other activities which are done for their
own sake, potting seems to derive its central value from the degree to which
the potter is able to put himself
into the work. But if the potter is to extend himself through his work, to
pour a little of himself into the pots, he must have a firm grip on the methods
of pottery making. In many ways pottery is an exacting craft. The ease with
which a lump of clay can be made to assume different shapes by the untutored
hand is deceptive. Until one gains control of the manual processes involved,
and learns to understand the temperament of clay as it dries and changes,
and until one is able to foresee and to use the transformations of the fire,
one
is really at the mercy of the medium rather than in control of it, and the
results, although they may be expressive of process to a degree, will not
be something capable of being ripened and developed. All the processes of
pottery,
when carried out with skill and understanding, have an expressive potential;
this potential is fulfilled only when the process becomes second nature,
when the work can proceed with élan.
- Daniel Rhodes


|
|